New research from the Weizmann Institute of Science reveals how mouse whiskers can ‘hear’ the world.
Nestled in dark burrows, with a limited sense of vision, mice brush their whiskers against their environment to navigate and to detect objects around them. This behaviour, termed whisking, has been extensively studied in the past few decades and has traditionally been viewed as purely an act of touch.
Now Weizmann researchers present an entirely new, multisensory view of this process. These resounding findings, published recently in Current Biology, reveal that whisking generates subtle sounds that are encoded in the auditory cortex of mice, enhancing their perception of their surroundings.
“Whiskers are so delicate that no one had thought of checking whether they produce sounds that mice are able to hear,” said team leader Professor Ilan Lampl of Weizmann’s Brain Sciences Department.
The study offers a unique glimpse into the complexity of natural perception, which commonly involves input from multiple senses, in this case touch and hearing. In fact humans too combine these two types of cues more often than one might think. Imagine, for example, your fingers delving into a crowded bag to search for a candy bar and the sudden, welcome rustle of the wrapper.
In the new study, Lampl’s team – led by Dr Ben Efron, then a PhD student, who worked with Drs Athanasios Ntelezos and Yonatan Katz – started out by recording the sounds made by whiskers probing different surfaces, including dried Bougainvillea leaves and aluminium foil. The researchers used sensitive microphones that can record ultrasonic frequencies, which are beyond the upper limit of the audible range for humans. They placed the microphones some two centimetres from the source of the sound, about the same distance as from the mouse’s ear to its whiskers.
Next, the scientists made entirely different recordings: They measured neural activity in the auditory cortex of mice that were brushing their whiskers against different objects. The recordings showed that the auditory networks of the mice responded to the whisker-generated sounds, no matter how subtle. When the researchers interrupted the pathways that convey the sensation of touch from the whiskers to the brain, the auditory cortex still responded to these sounds, showing that mice could process them as a separate sensory input, independent of the sense of touch.
Yet the fact that the mouse auditory system responds to certain noises does not necessarily mean that mice use them for sensing and can recognize objects by means of these noises. To explore this issue, the researchers resorted to AI. They first trained a machine-learning model to identify objects based on neural activity recorded from the auditory cortex of mice.
The AI successfully identified the correct objects from neuronal activity alone, suggesting that the mice might be able to similarly interpret these cues. Next, the researchers trained another machine-learning model to identify objects on the basis of recorded sounds made by whiskers probing these objects. The two models – the one trained on neural activity alone and the one trained on sound recordings – were equally successful, which suggests that the neural responses to the whisking were caused directly by the sounds rather than by other sensory information, such as that coming from smell or touch.
These findings led the researchers to the central question of their study: Can mice recognise objects using whisker-generated sounds alone?
To address this, Efron and colleagues performed a behavioural experiment. They trained mice, whose touch sensation had been abolished, to recognise aluminium foil solely by its whisker-generated sound. The mice responded to the sounds in a consistent manner, connecting those sounds to the sensory information they represented.
“Our results show that the brain’s whisking network, called the vibrissa system, operates in an integrative, multimodal manner when the animals actively explore their surroundings,” Lampl summed up.
This multimodal function, he further explained, might have developed in the course of evolution to help mice hunt for prey or avoid their own predators.
“Since whisking generates much weaker sounds than does walking, a mouse could rely on it when, for example, choosing whether to walk across a brittle, drier field of crops versus a fresher, quieter one, to avoid being detected by an owl. Whisking could also help a mouse figure out whether a stem is hollow or sufficiently juicy and worthy of a bite.”
By breaking down the boundaries between touch and hearing, the study doesn’t just reveal something new about mice, it opens up a plethora of research directions for future explorations of the brain’s sensory systems, particularly mechanisms by which the brain integrates different types of sensory input. The new findings might also lead to practical innovations in technology.
The possibilities are endless. If the brain can simultaneously process sensory information from different sources, the same principles might be used in prosthetics, sensory rehabilitation after brain trauma or perhaps even for enhancing perception in visually impaired individuals. For instance, learning exercises for the blind already exploit the distinct sounds produced by the white cane upon contact with a surface, and this approach could be developed further.
Another potential area for prospective innovation is robotics.
“Integrating different types of sensory input is a major challenge in the design of robotic systems,” Effron said.
“The mouse brain’s whisking system might provide inspiration for technologies that would address this challenge by, for example, helping to create early-warning sensors to prevent collisions, particularly when visibility is limited because of smoke or other visual obstructions.”
Professor Ilan Lampl’s research is supported by the Swiss Society Center for Research on Perception and Action; the Nella and Leon Benoziyo Center for Neurosciences; the Carl and Micaela Einhorn-Dominic Brain Research Institute; the Lorry I. Lokey Research School of Biochemical Science; the Murray H. & Meyer Grodetsky Center for Research of Higher Brain Functions; the Hedda, Alberto, and David Milman Baron Center for Research on the Development of Neural Networks; the Lilly and Zdenek Capek Charitable Foundation; and Daniel Andreae.
