Viruses Caught Talking to Each Other

January 23, 2017

Viruses may be stealthy invaders, but a study reported in Nature from the Weizmann Institute of Science reveals a new, chatty side of some: For the first time, viruses have been found communicating with one another.  This communication – short ‘posts’ left for kin and descendants – helps viruses reading these to decide how to proceed with the infection process.

Many viruses face a choice after they have infected their hosts: to replicate quickly, killing the cell in the process, or to become dormant and lie in wait. HIV, herpes and a number of other human viruses behave this way and, in fact, even the viruses that attack bacteria – phages – face similar decisions when invading a cell.

What causes a virus to choose dormancy over immediate gratification? Professor Rotem Sorek and his group in the Weizmann Institute’s Molecular Genetics Department have now discovered that during infection, viruses secrete small molecules into their environment that other viruses can pick up and ‘read’.  In this way, they can actually coordinate their attack, turning simple messages into a fairly sophisticated strategy.

According to Sorek he and his group discovered the communications between phages almost by accident.

“We were looking for communication between bacteria infected by phages, but we realized that the small molecules we were finding had been sent by the phages themselves,” he said.

To find evidence for this communication, the team grew bacteria in culture and infected them with phages; they then filtered the bacteria and phages out of the culture, leaving only the smallest molecules that had been released to the medium. When they grew more bacteria on the filtered medium, infecting them with the same phages, they were surprised to find that the new phages became dormant rather than killing the bacteria.

Sorek and his group, led by research student Zohar Erez, with Staff Scientist Dr Gil Amitai and Dr Ida Levy of the Israel Institute for Biological Research, worked to isolate the communication molecule, eventually discovering that it is a small piece of protein called a peptide; they also worked to identify the gene encoding it and to unravel the way it functions. They found that in the presence of high concentrations of this peptide, phages choose the dormancy strategy, so they named it arbitrium, Latin for decision.

“At the beginning of infection, it makes sense for the viruses to go the fast-replication, kill-the-host route, but if they are too gung-ho, there won’t be any hosts left for future generations of viruses to infect. At some point, the viruses need to switch strategies and become dormant,” explained Sorek.

“The molecule we discovered enables each generation of viruses to communicate with successive generations by adding to concentrations of the arbitrium molecule. Each virus can then ‘count’ how many previous viruses have succeeded in infecting host cells and thus decide which strategy is best at any point in time.”

The team found that the peptide binds a particular viral protein, which they identified as the genetic inhibitor of the dormancy life cycle. This binding inactivates the inhibitor, shifting the balance into choosing dormancy.

Once they had identified this communication molecule in one phage, the researchers were able to find similar molecules in dozens of related phages – each phage encoding a slightly different communication molecule.

“We deciphered a phage-specific communication code. It is as if each phage species broadcasts on a specific molecular ‘frequency’ that can be ‘read’ by phages of its own kind, but not by other phages,” Sorek said.

Sorek explained that the communication-based dormancy strategy he and his group discovered was found in phages, but may have broader implications.

“We don’t really know how viruses that infect the human body decide to go dormant. It is possible that a similar strategy to that of the phages could be used by viruses that infect us. If the viruses that infect humans are found to communicate with one another in a similar manner, we might learn to intercept these messages and use them to our advantage.”

Professor Rotem Sorek’s research is supported by the Abisch Frenkel Foundation for the Promotion of Life Sciences; the Leona M. and Harry B. Helmsley Charitable Trust; the Dana and Yossie Hollander Center for Structural Proteomics; the Dr. Dvora and Haim Teitelbaum Endowment Fund; and Martin Kushner Schnur, Mexico.

 

 

Previous
White Blood Cells' Secrets Uncovered
January 27, 2017
Next
Bats Remember Directions
January 13, 2017

More Research

A Hundred Million Suns: The Most Complete Portrait of a Supernova

Humankind has long turned to the skies in search of answers. Accounts of supernovae – exploding stars – go back thousands of years, but while we know today that these…

eastRead More

Fungus vs. Fungus: Newly Identified Yeast Might Prevent Life-Threatening Fungal Infections

Researchers at the Weizmann Institute of Science have identified a yeast that might be used to prevent invasive candidiasis, a major cause of death in hospitalised and immunocompromised patients. The…

eastRead More

Toward a Treatment for Huntington’s Disease

Weizmann Institute of Science scientists have discovered two small molecules that can cross the blood-brain barrier in mice, slowing and even reversing the effects of Huntington’s, which is incurable. The…

eastRead More

Proteins without Parents

Using three AI protein prediction tools, a Chinese-Israeli study at the Weizmann Institute of Science uncovered new wrinkles in the folding story of ‘orphan’ proteins. When Weizmann Professors Joel Sussman…

eastRead More

View All